

Two springs connected in series support a weight. Strings slightly longer than the springs are connected in parallel with each spring, as photographed. The connecting wire loop between the two springs is then removed, forming two separate parallel routes, each consisting of a spring and a string in series. Comparing the final configuration with the initial configuration, will the weight be higher, lower, or at the same vertical position?
The pictures above show the system in its initial and final configurations, as well as in detail of how the springs and strings are coupled at the center.
This demonstration is an analog to paradoxical behavior in complex series/parallel arrangements for other mechanical, hydraulic, and electrical systems. Perhaps the most notable is Braess' paradox for traffic flow. In certain types of congested traffic flow situations, opening an additional new route between two points may actually increase the average time taken to travel between the two points.
Demonstrate the linear relationship between force and stretching for a simple spring. Read More
Demonstrate Hooke's law for a spring under compression.
Read More
Show static combinations of springs Read More
Illustrate series and parallel springs in a counterintuitive way.
Read More
Demonstrate Hooke's law and elastic limit.
Read More
Demonstrate the elastic limit for an inherently inelastic object.
Read More
Burst a balloon.
Read More
Demonstrate the variation in tensile strength with wire diameter.
Read More
Demonstrate the small deflection of an aluminum beam due to weighting between supports.
Read More
Demonstrate the dependence of the compressional strength of wooden dowels on their diameter and length.
Read More
Show how a small change in the geometry of the can wall can dramatically affect its ability to support a… Read More
Show that an egg can support unexpectedly high forces due to its curved shape.
Read More